Kimi K2.7 Code vs LongCat 2.0
Which is better for the money: Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi or LongCat 2.0 by LongCat? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K2.7 Code scores 6.7 points higher (25.8 vs 19.1) but costs 1.8× as much to run the benchmark ($993 vs $545; both premium class). Pick Kimi K2.7 Code when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise LongCat 2.0.
| Metric | Kimi K2.7 Code | LongCat 2.0 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 25.8 | 19.1 | −26.0% LongCat 2.0 is 26.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $992.88 | $544.74 | −45.1% LongCat 2.0 is 45.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 46.75s | 35.54s | −24.0% LongCat 2.0 is 24.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.95 / $4.00 | $0.75 / $2.95 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text |
LongCat 2.0 vs Kimi K2.7 Code: 26.0% less intelligence, 45.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 24.0% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- LongCat 2.0 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
Kimi K2.7 CodeLongCat 2.0Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/longcat-2-0 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/longcat-2-0?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill