Kimi K2.7 Code vs LongCat 2.0
Which is better for the money: Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi or LongCat 2.0 by LongCat? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-17.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K2.7 Code scores 9.0 points higher (43.0 vs 34.0) but costs 1.2× as much to run the benchmark ($545 vs $442; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick Kimi K2.7 Code when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise LongCat 2.0.
| Metric | Kimi K2.7 Code | LongCat 2.0 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 43.0 | 34.0 | −20.9% LongCat 2.0 is 20.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $544.58 | $441.77 | −18.9% LongCat 2.0 is 18.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 73.20s | 58.34s | −20.3% LongCat 2.0 is 20.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.95 / $4.00 | $0.75 / $2.95 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
LongCat 2.0 vs Kimi K2.7 Code: 20.9% less intelligence, 18.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 20.3% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Gemini 3.7 Flash (high) scores 56.00 for $485.
- LongCat 2.0 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Gemini 3.7 Flash (medium) scores 53.40 for $278.
Kimi K2.7 CodeLongCat 2.0Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/longcat-2-0 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/longcat-2-0?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill