Kimi K2.7 Code vs LongCat 2.0
Which is better for the money: Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi or LongCat 2.0 by LongCat? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K2.7 Code scores 6.6 points higher (26.3 vs 19.7) but costs 1.8× as much to run the benchmark ($993 vs $545; both premium class). Pick Kimi K2.7 Code when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise LongCat 2.0.
| Metric | Kimi K2.7 Code | LongCat 2.0 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.3 | 19.7 | −25.1% LongCat 2.0 is 25.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $992.88 | $544.74 | −45.1% LongCat 2.0 is 45.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 41.22s | 54.47s | +32.1% LongCat 2.0 is 32.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.95 / $4.00 | $0.75 / $2.95 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
LongCat 2.0 vs Kimi K2.7 Code: 25.1% less intelligence, 45.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 32.1% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
- LongCat 2.0 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
Kimi K2.7 CodeLongCat 2.0Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/longcat-2-0 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/longcat-2-0?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill