Kimi K2.7 Code vs LongCat 2.0
Which is better for the money: Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi or LongCat 2.0 by LongCat? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-22.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K2.7 Code scores 6.7 points higher (25.8 vs 19.1) but costs 4.5× as much to run the benchmark ($993 vs $221; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K2.7 Code when you need intelligence above 19.1, and LongCat 2.0 when 19.1 is enough.
| Metric | Kimi K2.7 Code | LongCat 2.0 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 25.8 | 19.1 | −26.0% LongCat 2.0 is 26.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $992.88 | $220.75 | −77.8% LongCat 2.0 is 77.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 47.33s | Not reported | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.95 / $4.00 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text |
LongCat 2.0 vs Kimi K2.7 Code: 26.0% less intelligence, 77.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- LongCat 2.0 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Kimi K2.7 CodeLongCat 2.0Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/longcat-2-0 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/longcat-2-0?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill