Kimi K2.7 Code vs Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi or Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-07.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K2.7 Code scores 23.3 points higher (43.0 vs 19.7) but costs 6.2× as much to run the benchmark ($545 vs $87.7; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K2.7 Code when you need intelligence above 19.7, and Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) when 19.7 is enough.
| Metric | Kimi K2.7 Code | Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 43.0 | 19.7 | −54.2% Mistral Small 4 (Reas… is 54.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $544.58 | $87.67 | −83.9% Mistral Small 4 (Reas… is 83.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 66.82s | 18.35s | −72.5% Mistral Small 4 (Reas… is 72.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.95 / $4.00 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) vs Kimi K2.7 Code: 54.2% less intelligence, 83.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 72.5% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (max) scores 52.30 for $172.
- Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Reasoning, Max Effort) scores 51.80 for $72.0.
Kimi K2.7 CodeMistral Small 4 (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/mistral-small-4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/mistral-small-4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill