Kimi K2.7 Code vs Muse Spark 1.3 (max)
Which is better for the money: Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi or Muse Spark 1.3 (max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.3 (max) scores 21.9 points higher (48.2 vs 26.3) but costs 2.0× as much to run the benchmark ($2000 vs $993; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick Muse Spark 1.3 (max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Kimi K2.7 Code.
| Metric | Kimi K2.7 Code | Muse Spark 1.3 (max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.3 | 48.2 | +83.3% Muse Spark 1.3 (max) is 83.3% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $992.88 | $2,000.35 | +101.5% Muse Spark 1.3 (max) is 2.0× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 41.22s | 36.91s | −10.5% Muse Spark 1.3 (max) is 10.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.95 / $4.00 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Muse Spark 1.3 (max) vs Kimi K2.7 Code: 83.3% more intelligence, 101.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 10.5% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
- Muse Spark 1.3 (max) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Kimi K2.7 CodeMuse Spark 1.3 (max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/muse-spark-1-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/muse-spark-1-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill