Kimi K2.7 Code vs Muse Spark Open (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi or Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) scores 13.1 points higher (38.9 vs 25.8) but costs 1.2× as much to run the benchmark ($1185 vs $993; both premium class). Pick Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Kimi K2.7 Code.
| Metric | Kimi K2.7 Code | Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 25.8 | 38.9 | +50.8% Muse Spark Open (Xhig… is 50.8% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $992.88 | $1,184.90 | +19.3% Muse Spark Open (Xhig… is 19.3% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 46.75s | 17.34s | −62.9% Muse Spark Open (Xhig… is 62.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.95 / $4.00 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) vs Kimi K2.7 Code: 50.8% more intelligence, 19.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 62.9% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Kimi K2.7 CodeMuse Spark Open (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/muse-spark-open · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/muse-spark-open?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill