Kimi K2.7 Code vs Muse Wonder (Max)
Which is better for the money: Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi or Muse Wonder (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Wonder (Max) scores 26.6 points higher (52.4 vs 25.8) but costs 5.8× as much to run the benchmark ($5787 vs $993; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Wonder (Max) when you need intelligence above 25.8, and Kimi K2.7 Code when 25.8 is enough.
| Metric | Kimi K2.7 Code | Muse Wonder (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 25.8 | 52.4 | +103.1% Muse Wonder (Max) is 2.0× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $992.88 | $5,786.78 | +482.8% Muse Wonder (Max) is 5.8× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 46.75s | 41.43s | −11.4% Muse Wonder (Max) is 11.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.95 / $4.00 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Wonder (Max) vs Kimi K2.7 Code: 103.1% more intelligence, 482.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 11.4% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Muse Wonder (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
Kimi K2.7 CodeMuse Wonder (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/muse-wonder · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/muse-wonder?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill