Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Muse Glimmer (High)
Which is better for the money: Kimi K3.1 Pro by Kimi or Muse Glimmer (High) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 37.6 points higher (55.1 vs 17.5) but costs 21× as much to run the benchmark ($3117 vs $146; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K3.1 Pro when you need intelligence above 17.5, and Muse Glimmer (High) when 17.5 is enough.
| Metric | Kimi K3.1 Pro | Muse Glimmer (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 55.1 | 17.5 | −68.2% Muse Glimmer (High) is 68.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,117.31 | $145.77 | −95.3% Muse Glimmer (High) is 95.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 42.64s | 24.76s | −41.9% Muse Glimmer (High) is 41.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Muse Glimmer (High) vs Kimi K3.1 Pro: 68.2% less intelligence, 95.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 41.9% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K3.1 Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Muse Glimmer (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
Kimi K3.1 ProMuse Glimmer (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k3-1-pro/muse-glimmer · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k3-1-pro/muse-glimmer?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill