Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Kimi K3.1 Pro by Kimi or Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 34.9 points higher (55.1 vs 20.2) but costs 1.5× as much to run the benchmark ($3117 vs $2022; both flagship class). Pick Kimi K3.1 Pro when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning).
| Metric | Kimi K3.1 Pro | Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 55.1 | 20.2 | −63.3% Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reas… is 63.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,117.31 | $2,022.49 | −35.1% Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reas… is 35.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 59.28s | 13.84s | −76.7% Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reas… is 76.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.50 / $3.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) vs Kimi K3.1 Pro: 63.3% less intelligence, 35.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 76.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K3.1 Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Kimi K3.1 ProQwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k3-1-pro/qwen3-8-27b-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k3-1-pro/qwen3-8-27b-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill