Kimi K3 (Low) vs Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Kimi K3 (Low) by Kimi or Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) scores 3.6 points higher (33.7 vs 30.1) but costs 1.5× as much to run the benchmark ($1737 vs $1190; both premium class). Pick Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Kimi K3 (Low).
| Metric | Kimi K3 (Low) | Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 30.1 | 33.7 | +12.0% Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is 12.0% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,190.42 | $1,737.18 | +45.9% Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is 45.9% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 56.42s | 21.59s | −61.7% Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is 61.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $3.00 / $15.0 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) vs Kimi K3 (Low): 12.0% more intelligence, 45.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 61.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K3 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Kimi K3 (Low)Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k3-low/muse-spark-1-1 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k3-low/muse-spark-1-1?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill