Kimi K3 (Low) vs Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)
Which is better for the money: Kimi K3 (Low) by Kimi or Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) scores 18.0 points higher (48.1 vs 30.1) but costs 1.7× as much to run the benchmark ($2000 vs $1190; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Kimi K3 (Low).
| Metric | Kimi K3 (Low) | Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 30.1 | 48.1 | +59.8% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 59.8% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,190.42 | $2,000.35 | +68.0% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 68.0% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 56.42s | 71.36s | +26.5% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 26.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $3.00 / $15.0 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) vs Kimi K3 (Low): 59.8% more intelligence, 68.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 26.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K3 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Kimi K3 (Low)Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k3-low/muse-spark-1-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k3-low/muse-spark-1-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill