Kimi K3 (Low) vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Which is better for the money: Kimi K3 (Low) by Kimi or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K3 (Low) scores 3.6 points higher (30.1 vs 26.5) but costs 4.2× as much to run the benchmark ($1190 vs $286; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K3 (Low) when you need intelligence above 26.5, and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL when 26.5 is enough.
| Metric | Kimi K3 (Low) | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 30.1 | 26.5 | −12.0% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 12.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,190.42 | $286.07 | −76.0% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 76.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 49.80s | 6.31s | −87.3% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 87.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $3.00 / $15.0 | $0.23 / $0.57 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Kimi K3 (Low): 12.0% less intelligence, 76.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 87.3% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K3 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Kimi K3 (Low)Nemotron 3.5 Super VLToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k3-low/nemotron-3-5-super-vl · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k3-low/nemotron-3-5-super-vl?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill