Kimi K3 (Low) vs Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Kimi K3 (Low) by Kimi or Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K3 (Low) scores 8.7 points higher (30.1 vs 21.4) but costs 1.0× as much to run the benchmark ($1190 vs $1145; both premium class). Pick Kimi K3 (Low) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning).
| Metric | Kimi K3 (Low) | Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 30.1 | 21.4 | −28.9% Qwen3.6 27B (Reasonin… is 28.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,190.42 | $1,145.36 | −3.8% Qwen3.6 27B (Reasonin… is 3.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 51.29s | 110.87s | +116.2% Qwen3.6 27B (Reasonin… is 116.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $3.00 / $15.0 | $0.60 / $3.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) vs Kimi K3 (Low): 28.9% less intelligence, 3.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 116.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K3 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Kimi K3 (Low)Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k3-low/qwen3-6-27b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k3-low/qwen3-6-27b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill