Kimi K3 (Max) vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Which is better for the money: Kimi K3 (Max) by Kimi or MiMo-V2.6-Flash by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K3 (Max) scores 5.7 points higher (43.6 vs 37.9) but costs 33× as much to run the benchmark ($3658 vs $110; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K3 (Max) when you need intelligence above 37.9, and MiMo-V2.6-Flash when 37.9 is enough.
| Metric | Kimi K3 (Max) | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 43.6 | 37.9 | −13.1% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 13.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,658.07 | $109.55 | −97.0% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 97.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 63.08s | 49.53s | −21.5% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 21.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $3.00 / $15.0 | $0.14 / $0.28 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Kimi K3 (Max): 13.1% less intelligence, 97.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 21.5% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K3 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Kimi K3 (Max)MiMo-V2.6-FlashToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k3/mimo-v2-6-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k3/mimo-v2-6-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill