Kimi K3 (Max) vs Qwen3.7 Max
Which is better for the money: Kimi K3 (Max) by Kimi or Qwen3.7 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K3 (Max) scores 14.1 points higher (43.6 vs 29.5) but costs 1.6× as much to run the benchmark ($3658 vs $2277; both flagship class). Pick Kimi K3 (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3.7 Max.
| Metric | Kimi K3 (Max) | Qwen3.7 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 43.6 | 29.5 | −32.3% Qwen3.7 Max is 32.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,658.07 | $2,277.12 | −37.8% Qwen3.7 Max is 37.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 58.57s | 16.57s | −71.7% Qwen3.7 Max is 71.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $3.00 / $15.0 | $2.50 / $7.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Qwen3.7 Max vs Kimi K3 (Max): 32.3% less intelligence, 37.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 71.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K3 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
- Qwen3.7 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
Kimi K3 (Max)Qwen3.7 MaxToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k3/qwen3-7-max · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k3/qwen3-7-max?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill