Kimi K3 (Max) vs Qwen3.8 27B (Medium)
Which is better for the money: Kimi K3 (Max) by Kimi or Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K3 (Max) scores 16.0 points higher (43.6 vs 27.6) but costs 3.1× as much to run the benchmark ($3658 vs $1165; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K3 (Max) when you need intelligence above 27.6, and Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) when 27.6 is enough.
| Metric | Kimi K3 (Max) | Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 43.6 | 27.6 | −36.7% Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) is 36.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,658.07 | $1,165.00 | −68.2% Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) is 68.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 56.00s | 56.04s | +0.1% Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) is 0.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $3.00 / $15.0 | $0.50 / $3.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) vs Kimi K3 (Max): 36.7% less intelligence, 68.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 0.1% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K3 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
- Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Kimi K3 (Max)Qwen3.8 27B (Medium)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k3/qwen3-8-27b-medium · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k3/qwen3-8-27b-medium?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill