Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct vs Muse Wonder (Max)

Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct vs Muse Wonder (Max). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

KimiKimi Linear 48B A3B InstructNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
7.30
Total cost
-
MetaMuse Wonder (Max)Off the frontier
Intelligence
52.40
Total cost
$5787
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricKimi Linear 48B A3B InstructMuse Wonder (Max)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)7.352.4+617.8% Muse Wonder (Max) is 7.2× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$5,786.78— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)Not reported40.70s— not comparable
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)—$4.00 / $20.0
Input modalitiesTextText, Image, Speech, Video
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerKimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct: what beats itMuse Wonder (Max): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-linear-48b-a3b-instruct/muse-wonder · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-linear-48b-a3b-instruct/muse-wonder?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill