Ling 3.0 Flash vs LongCat 2.0

Ling 3.0 Flash vs LongCat 2.0. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

InclusionAILing 3.0 FlashNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
20.10
Total cost
-
LongCatLongCat 2.0Off the frontier
Intelligence
19.10
Total cost
$545
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricLing 3.0 FlashLongCat 2.0Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)20.119.1−5.0% LongCat 2.0 is 5.0% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$544.74— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)10.63s35.54s+234.3% LongCat 2.0 is 234.3% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.07 / $0.22$0.75 / $2.95
Input modalitiesTextText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerLing 3.0 Flash: what beats itLongCat 2.0: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/ling-3-0-flash/longcat-2-0 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/ling-3-0-flash/longcat-2-0?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill