Ling 3.0 Flash vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Ling 3.0 Flash by InclusionAI or Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) scores 2.8 points higher (22.9 vs 20.1) but costs 6.6× as much to run the benchmark ($596 vs $89.8; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) when you need intelligence above 20.1, and Ling 3.0 Flash when 20.1 is enough.
| Metric | Ling 3.0 Flash | Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 20.1 | 22.9 | +13.9% Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B… is 13.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $89.77 | $596.33 | +564.3% Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B… is 6.6× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.85s | 15.27s | +18.8% Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B… is 18.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.07 / $0.22 | $0.60 / $2.70 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) vs Ling 3.0 Flash: 13.9% more intelligence, 564.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 18.8% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Ling 3.0 Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) scores 34.60 for $66.8.
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
Ling 3.0 FlashNemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/ling-3-0-flash/nvidia-nemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/ling-3-0-flash/nvidia-nemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill