Ling 3.0 Flash vs Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 Instruct

Ling 3.0 Flash vs Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 Instruct. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

InclusionAILing 3.0 FlashNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
20.10
Total cost
-
AlibabaQwen3 235B A22B 2507 InstructNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
12.00
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricLing 3.0 FlashQwen3 235B A22B 2507 InstructDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)20.112.0−40.3% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 40.3% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)12.81s10.44s−18.5% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 18.5% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.07 / $0.22$0.21 / $0.84
Input modalitiesTextText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerLing 3.0 Flash: what beats itQwen3 235B A22B 2507 Instruct: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/ling-3-0-flash/qwen3-235b-a22b-instruct-2507 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/ling-3-0-flash/qwen3-235b-a22b-instruct-2507?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill