Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 vs Mistral Large 4 Preview
Which is better for the money: Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 by InclusionAI or Mistral Large 4 Preview by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-29.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Ling 3.1 Flash 1019
Mistral Large 4 Preview vs Ling 3.1 Flash 1019: 14.2% less intelligence, 45.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
| Metric | Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 | Mistral Large 4 Preview | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 29.5 | 25.3 | −14.2% Mistral Large 4 Previ… is 14.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,009.23 | $2,923.39 | +45.5% Mistral Large 4 Previ… is 45.5% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 25.54s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $0.90 | $0.70 / $2.10 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 54.50 for $1124.
- Mistral Large 4 Preview is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 54.50 for $1124.
Ling 3.1 Flash 1019Mistral Large 4 PreviewToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/ling-3-1-flash-1019/mistral-large-4-preview · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/ling-3-1-flash-1019/mistral-large-4-preview?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill