Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 by InclusionAI or Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 scores 31.1 points higher (43.9 vs 12.8) but costs 1.2× as much to run the benchmark ($1552 vs $1319; both premium class). Pick Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning).
| Metric | Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 | Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 43.9 | 12.8 | −70.8% Nemotron 3 Super 120B… is 70.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,551.81 | $1,318.62 | −15.0% Nemotron 3 Super 120B… is 15.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 16.68s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $0.90 | $0.30 / $0.90 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) vs Ling 3.1 Flash 1019: 70.8% less intelligence, 15.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Ling 3.1 Flash 1019Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/ling-3-1-flash-1019/nvidia-nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/ling-3-1-flash-1019/nvidia-nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill