Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 vs Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B

Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 vs Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

InclusionAILing 3.1 Flash 1019Off the frontier
Intelligence
43.90
Total cost
$1552
AlibabaQwen2.5 Instruct 72BNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
7.70
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricLing 3.1 Flash 1019Qwen2.5 Instruct 72BDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)43.97.7−82.5% Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B is 82.5% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$1,551.81Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)Not reported24.79s— not comparable
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.30 / $0.90$0.47 / $0.49
Input modalitiesTextText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerLing 3.1 Flash 1019: what beats itQwen2.5 Instruct 72B: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/ling-3-1-flash-1019/qwen2-5-72b-instruct · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/ling-3-1-flash-1019/qwen2-5-72b-instruct?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill