Ling 3.1 Flash vs Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B

Ling 3.1 Flash vs Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

InclusionAILing 3.1 FlashOff the frontier
Intelligence
41.10
Total cost
$1015
AlibabaQwen2.5 Instruct 72BNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
7.70
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricLing 3.1 FlashQwen2.5 Instruct 72BDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)41.17.7−81.3% Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B is 81.3% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$1,014.56Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)13.66s22.71s+66.3% Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B is 66.3% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.30 / $0.90$0.47 / $0.49
Input modalitiesTextText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerLing 3.1 Flash: what beats itQwen2.5 Instruct 72B: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/ling-3-1-flash/qwen2-5-72b-instruct · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/ling-3-1-flash/qwen2-5-72b-instruct?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill