Ling 3.1 Flash vs Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 Instruct

Ling 3.1 Flash vs Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 Instruct. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

InclusionAILing 3.1 FlashOff the frontier
Intelligence
41.10
Total cost
$1015
AlibabaQwen3 30B A3B 2507 InstructNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
7.50
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricLing 3.1 FlashQwen3 30B A3B 2507 InstructDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)41.17.5−81.8% Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 In… is 81.8% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$1,014.56Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)13.61s3.40s−75.0% Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 In… is 75.0% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.30 / $0.90$0.10 / $0.30
Input modalitiesTextText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerLing 3.1 Flash: what beats itQwen3 30B A3B 2507 Instruct: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/ling-3-1-flash/qwen3-30b-a3b-2507 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/ling-3-1-flash/qwen3-30b-a3b-2507?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill