Ling 3.1 Flash vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B Instruct

Ling 3.1 Flash vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B Instruct. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

InclusionAILing 3.1 FlashOff the frontier
Intelligence
41.10
Total cost
$1015
AlibabaQwen3 Coder 480B A35B InstructNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
11.90
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricLing 3.1 FlashQwen3 Coder 480B A35B InstructDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)41.111.9−71.0% Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B… is 71.0% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$1,014.56Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)13.64s6.98s−48.8% Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B… is 48.8% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.30 / $0.90$0.38 / $1.40
Input modalitiesTextText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerLing 3.1 Flash: what beats itQwen3 Coder 480B A35B Instruct: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/ling-3-1-flash/qwen3-coder-480b-a35b-instruct · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/ling-3-1-flash/qwen3-coder-480b-a35b-instruct?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill