Ling-flash-2.0 vs Qwen3.8 Max

Ling-flash-2.0 vs Qwen3.8 Max. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

InclusionAILing-flash-2.0Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
7.80
Total cost
-
AlibabaQwen3.8 MaxOff the frontier
Intelligence
40.20
Total cost
$3172
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricLing-flash-2.0Qwen3.8 MaxDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)7.840.2+415.4% Qwen3.8 Max is 5.2× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$3,172.37— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)112.65s64.18s−43.0% Qwen3.8 Max is 43.0% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.14 / $0.57$2.00 / $6.00
Input modalitiesTextText, Image, Video
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerLing-flash-2.0: what beats itQwen3.8 Max: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/ling-flash-2-0/qwen3-8-max-0803 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/ling-flash-2-0/qwen3-8-max-0803?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill