Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision) vs Mercury 2.5

Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision) vs Mercury 2.5. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetaLlama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
5.40
Total cost
-
InceptionMercury 2.5Off the frontier
Intelligence
12.30
Total cost
$218
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricLlama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision)Mercury 2.5Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)5.412.3+127.8% Mercury 2.5 is 2.3× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$218.11— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)20.30s4.18s−79.4% Mercury 2.5 is 79.4% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.34 / $0.34$0.25 / $0.75
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerLlama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision): what beats itMercury 2.5: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/llama-3-2-instruct-11b-vision/mercury-2-5 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/llama-3-2-instruct-11b-vision/mercury-2-5?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill