Llama 4 Maverick vs Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)
Which is better for the money: Llama 4 Maverick by Meta or Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) scores 38.8 points higher (48.1 vs 9.3) but costs 45× as much to run the benchmark ($2000 vs $44.0; flagship vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) when you need intelligence above 9.3, and Llama 4 Maverick when 9.3 is enough.
| Metric | Llama 4 Maverick | Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 9.3 | 48.1 | +417.2% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 5.2× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $43.98 | $2,000.35 | +4448.3% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 45× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 10.41s | 67.10s | +544.6% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 544.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.25 / $0.92 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) vs Llama 4 Maverick: 417.2% more intelligence, 4448.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 544.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Llama 4 Maverick is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
- Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Llama 4 MaverickMuse Spark 1.3 (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/llama-4-maverick/muse-spark-1-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/llama-4-maverick/muse-spark-1-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill