Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Llama 4 Maverick by Meta or Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) scores 3.4 points higher (12.7 vs 9.3) but costs 5.3× as much to run the benchmark ($234 vs $44.0; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) when you need intelligence above 9.3, and Llama 4 Maverick when 9.3 is enough.
| Metric | Llama 4 Maverick | Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 9.3 | 12.7 | +36.6% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 36.6% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $43.98 | $233.56 | +431.1% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 5.3× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 10.61s | 22.73s | +114.2% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 114.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.25 / $0.92 | $0.23 / $2.30 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) vs Llama 4 Maverick: 36.6% more intelligence, 431.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 114.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Llama 4 Maverick is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
- Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Llama 4 MaverickQwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/llama-4-maverick/qwen3-235b-a22b-instruct-2507-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/llama-4-maverick/qwen3-235b-a22b-instruct-2507-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill