Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Which is better for the money: Llama 4 Maverick by Meta or Qwen3.7 Plus by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.7 Plus scores 15.9 points higher (25.2 vs 9.3) but costs 9.7× as much to run the benchmark ($428 vs $44.0; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3.7 Plus when you need intelligence above 9.3, and Llama 4 Maverick when 9.3 is enough.
| Metric | Llama 4 Maverick | Qwen3.7 Plus | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 9.3 | 25.2 | +171.0% Qwen3.7 Plus is 2.7× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $43.98 | $427.73 | +872.6% Qwen3.7 Plus is 9.7× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 10.45s | 47.00s | +349.8% Qwen3.7 Plus is 349.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.25 / $0.92 | $0.40 / $1.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.7 Plus vs Llama 4 Maverick: 171.0% more intelligence, 872.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 349.8% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Llama 4 Maverick is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Llama 4 MaverickQwen3.7 PlusToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/llama-4-maverick/qwen3-7-plus · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/llama-4-maverick/qwen3-7-plus?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill