Llama 4 Scout vs Quasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2)
Llama 4 Scout vs Quasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Llama 4 Scout | Quasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 6.5 | 26.7 | +310.8% Quasar 438B (Max, Bas… is 4.1× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $73.56 | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.06s | 16.26s | +221.3% Quasar 438B (Max, Bas… is 221.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.18 / $0.66 | $0.11 / $0.33 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/llama-4-scout/quasar-438b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/llama-4-scout/quasar-438b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill