LongCat 2.0 vs Mistral Large 4 Preview
Which is better for the money: LongCat 2.0 by LongCat or Mistral Large 4 Preview by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Mistral Large 4 Preview scores 19.3 points higher (38.4 vs 19.1) but costs 3.0× as much to run the benchmark ($1608 vs $545; both premium class). Pick Mistral Large 4 Preview when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise LongCat 2.0.
| Metric | LongCat 2.0 | Mistral Large 4 Preview | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 19.1 | 38.4 | +101.0% Mistral Large 4 Previ… is 2.0× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $544.74 | $1,607.86 | +195.2% Mistral Large 4 Previ… is 3.0× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 35.51s | 25.73s | −27.5% Mistral Large 4 Previ… is 27.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.75 / $2.95 | $1.36 / $4.18 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Mistral Large 4 Preview vs LongCat 2.0: 101.0% more intelligence, 195.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 27.5% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- LongCat 2.0 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- Mistral Large 4 Preview is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
LongCat 2.0Mistral Large 4 PreviewToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/longcat-2-0/mistral-large-4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/longcat-2-0/mistral-large-4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill