LongCat 2.0 vs Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: LongCat 2.0 by LongCat or Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) scores 14.6 points higher (33.7 vs 19.1) but costs 3.2× as much to run the benchmark ($1737 vs $545; both premium class). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 19.1, and LongCat 2.0 when 19.1 is enough.
| Metric | LongCat 2.0 | Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 19.1 | 33.7 | +76.4% Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is 76.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $544.74 | $1,737.18 | +218.9% Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is 3.2× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 37.06s | 21.59s | −41.7% Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is 41.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.75 / $2.95 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) vs LongCat 2.0: 76.4% more intelligence, 218.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 41.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- LongCat 2.0 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
LongCat 2.0Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/longcat-2-0/muse-spark-1-1 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/longcat-2-0/muse-spark-1-1?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill