LongCat 2.0 vs Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning)
LongCat 2.0 vs Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | LongCat 2.0 | Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 19.1 | 19.4 | +1.6% Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reas… is 1.6% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $544.74 | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 37.40s | 11.78s | −68.5% Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reas… is 68.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.75 / $2.95 | $0.30 / $2.40 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/longcat-2-0/qwen3-5-27b-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/longcat-2-0/qwen3-5-27b-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill