LongCat 2.0 vs Step 3.5 Flash
LongCat 2.0 vs Step 3.5 Flash. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | LongCat 2.0 | Step 3.5 Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 19.1 | 16.6 | −13.1% Step 3.5 Flash is 13.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $544.74 | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 35.69s | 20.68s | −42.1% Step 3.5 Flash is 42.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.75 / $2.95 | $0.10 / $0.30 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/longcat-2-0/step-3-5-flash-0202 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/longcat-2-0/step-3-5-flash-0202?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill