Mercury 2.5 vs Qwen3 14B (Non-reasoning)

Mercury 2.5 vs Qwen3 14B (Non-reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

InceptionMercury 2.5Off the frontier
Intelligence
12.30
Total cost
$218
AlibabaQwen3 14B (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
6.70
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricMercury 2.5Qwen3 14B (Non-reasoning)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)12.36.7−45.5% Qwen3 14B (Non-reason… is 45.5% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$218.11Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)4.24s6.99s+64.9% Qwen3 14B (Non-reason… is 64.9% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.25 / $0.75$0.12 / $0.24
Input modalitiesTextText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerMercury 2.5: what beats itQwen3 14B (Non-reasoning): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mercury-2-5/qwen3-14b-instruct · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mercury-2-5/qwen3-14b-instruct?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill