Mercury 2.5 vs Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
Mercury 2.5 vs Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Mercury 2.5 | Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 12.3 | 9.6 | −22.0% Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B I… is 22.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $218.11 | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 4.32s | 2.93s | −32.2% Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B I… is 32.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.25 / $0.75 | $0.19 / $0.77 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mercury-2-5/qwen3-coder-30b-a3b-instruct · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mercury-2-5/qwen3-coder-30b-a3b-instruct?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill