Mercury 2.5 vs Step 3.5 Flash
Mercury 2.5 vs Step 3.5 Flash. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Mercury 2.5 | Step 3.5 Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 12.3 | 16.6 | +35.0% Step 3.5 Flash is 35.0% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $218.11 | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 4.33s | 20.68s | +377.6% Step 3.5 Flash is 377.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.25 / $0.75 | $0.10 / $0.30 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mercury-2-5/step-3-5-flash-0202 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mercury-2-5/step-3-5-flash-0202?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill