Mercury 2 vs Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Mercury 2 by Inception or Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning)
Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) vs Mercury 2: 4.6% more intelligence, 59.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 79.5% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Mercury 2 | Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 10.8 | 11.3 | +4.6% Mistral Small 4 (Reas… is 4.6% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $104.94 | $42.50 | −59.5% Mistral Small 4 (Reas… is 59.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 8.08s | 14.50s | +79.5% Mistral Small 4 (Reas… is 79.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.25 / $0.75 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Mercury 2 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) scores 37.80 for $94.1.
- Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
Mercury 2Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mercury-2/mistral-small-4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mercury-2/mistral-small-4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill