Mercury 2 vs Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 Instruct
Mercury 2 vs Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 Instruct. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Mercury 2 | Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 Instruct | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 10.8 | 7.5 | −30.6% Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 In… is 30.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $104.94 | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.54s | 3.42s | −47.7% Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 In… is 47.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.25 / $0.75 | $0.10 / $0.30 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mercury-2/qwen3-30b-a3b-2507 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mercury-2/qwen3-30b-a3b-2507?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill