MiMo-V2.5 vs Qwen3 32B (Reasoning)

MiMo-V2.5 vs Qwen3 32B (Reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

XiaomiMiMo-V2.5On the open-weights frontier
Intelligence
21.80
Total cost
$61.9
AlibabaQwen3 32B (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
7.20
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricMiMo-V2.5Qwen3 32B (Reasoning)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)21.87.2−67.0% Qwen3 32B (Reasoning) is 67.0% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$61.93Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)53.92s91.88s+70.4% Qwen3 32B (Reasoning) is 70.4% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.13 / $0.27$0.24 / $0.54
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerMiMo-V2.5: what beats itQwen3 32B (Reasoning): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-0424/qwen3-32b-instruct-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-0424/qwen3-32b-instruct-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill