MiMo-V2.5 vs Trinity Large Thinking
Which is better for the money: MiMo-V2.5 by Xiaomi or Trinity Large Thinking by Arcee AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.5
Trinity Large Thinking vs MiMo-V2.5: 50.5% less intelligence, 276.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 80.1% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.5 | Trinity Large Thinking | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 21.8 | 10.8 | −50.5% Trinity Large Thinking is 50.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $61.93 | $232.95 | +276.2% Trinity Large Thinking is 3.8× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 41.73s | 8.30s | −80.1% Trinity Large Thinking is 80.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.13 / $0.27 | $0.25 / $0.80 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiMo-V2.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
- Trinity Large Thinking is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
MiMo-V2.5Trinity Large ThinkingToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-0424/trinity-large-thinking · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-0424/trinity-large-thinking?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill