MiMo-V2.5 vs Trinity Large Thinking
Which is better for the money: MiMo-V2.5 by Xiaomi or Trinity Large Thinking by Arcee AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-19.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.5
Trinity Large Thinking vs MiMo-V2.5: 50.8% less intelligence, 911.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 70.5% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.5 | Trinity Large Thinking | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 38.0 | 18.7 | −50.8% Trinity Large Thinking is 50.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $25.18 | $254.72 | +911.6% Trinity Large Thinking is 10× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 47.71s | 14.08s | −70.5% Trinity Large Thinking is 70.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.14 / $0.28 | $0.23 / $0.88 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiMo-V2.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (medium) scores 38.90 for $21.1.
- Trinity Large Thinking is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (max) scores 52.30 for $172.
MiMo-V2.5Trinity Large ThinkingToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-0424/trinity-large-thinking · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-0424/trinity-large-thinking?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill