MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) vs MiniMax-M3
Which is better for the money: MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) by Xiaomi or MiniMax-M3 by MiniMax? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiniMax-M3 scores 3.2 points higher (29.2 vs 26.0) but costs 2.3× as much to run the benchmark ($538 vs $231; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick MiniMax-M3 when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning).
| Metric | MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) | MiniMax-M3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.0 | 29.2 | +12.3% MiniMax-M3 is 12.3% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $231.08 | $537.98 | +132.8% MiniMax-M3 is 2.3× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 49.58s | 25.47s | −48.6% MiniMax-M3 is 48.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.41 / $1.02 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Video |
MiniMax-M3 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning): 12.3% more intelligence, 132.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 48.6% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- MiniMax-M3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning)MiniMax-M3Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-pro/minimax-m3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-pro/minimax-m3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill