MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) vs Ministral 3 3B
Which is better for the money: MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) by Xiaomi or Ministral 3 3B by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) scores 21.2 points higher (26.0 vs 4.8) but costs 19× as much to run the benchmark ($231 vs $12.2; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) when you need intelligence above 4.8, and Ministral 3 3B when 4.8 is enough.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) | Ministral 3 3B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.0 | 4.8 | −81.5% Ministral 3 3B is 81.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $231.08 | $12.23 | −94.7% Ministral 3 3B is 94.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 49.36s | 3.07s | −93.8% Ministral 3 3B is 93.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.41 / $1.02 | $0.10 / $0.10 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Ministral 3 3B vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning): 81.5% less intelligence, 94.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 93.8% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Ministral 3 3B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning)Ministral 3 3BToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-pro/ministral-3-3b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-pro/ministral-3-3b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill