MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) vs Muse Glimmer (High)
Which is better for the money: MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) by Xiaomi or Muse Glimmer (High) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) scores 8.5 points higher (26.0 vs 17.5) but costs 1.6× as much to run the benchmark ($231 vs $146; both mid-range class). Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Muse Glimmer (High).
| Metric | MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) | Muse Glimmer (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.0 | 17.5 | −32.7% Muse Glimmer (High) is 32.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $231.08 | $145.77 | −36.9% Muse Glimmer (High) is 36.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 49.58s | 24.76s | −50.1% Muse Glimmer (High) is 50.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.41 / $1.02 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Muse Glimmer (High) vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning): 32.7% less intelligence, 36.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 50.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Muse Glimmer (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning)Muse Glimmer (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-pro/muse-glimmer · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-pro/muse-glimmer?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill