MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) vs Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) by Xiaomi or Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) scores 13.6 points higher (39.6 vs 26.0) but costs 6.0× as much to run the benchmark ($1385 vs $231; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 26.0, and MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) when 26.0 is enough.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) | Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.0 | 39.6 | +52.3% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 52.3% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $231.08 | $1,385.40 | +499.5% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 6.0× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 49.58s | 20.85s | −57.9% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 57.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.41 / $1.02 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning): 52.3% more intelligence, 499.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 57.9% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning)Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-pro/muse-spark-1-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-pro/muse-spark-1-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill