MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) vs Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)
Which is better for the money: MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) by Xiaomi or Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) scores 22.1 points higher (48.1 vs 26.0) but costs 8.7× as much to run the benchmark ($2000 vs $231; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) when you need intelligence above 26.0, and MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) when 26.0 is enough.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) | Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.0 | 48.1 | +85.0% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 85.0% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $231.08 | $2,000.35 | +765.7% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 8.7× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 49.64s | 75.86s | +52.8% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 52.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.41 / $1.02 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Video |
Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning): 85.0% more intelligence, 765.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 52.8% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning)Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-pro/muse-spark-1-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-pro/muse-spark-1-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill